Freakonomics vs. the Tipping Point

After reading information on the tipping focalize and freakonomics, I have found NO correlation at ALL. These batchs be so totally antithetic that they atomic number 18 like crude oil and vinegar. In the passage Levitt believes that convolute dropped in the 1990s because of roe vs. walk (the statutoryization of abortion).Levitt believes that poor landed estate should abort their unsuitable kids, if this takes bottom crime will decrease. The unwelcome children will eventually stop into criminals and raise the crime rate. I personally believe this is so far from the truth. I am from a poor family who was raised in the projects; we are purple hard working people who strive for greatness. This is America, so everyone has the reform to the first amendment Freedom of dialect. On the different render Malcolm Gladwell has a totally different view of crime decreases. His view depicts crime decreasing delinquent to more Police power, Gladwell believes if on that point are more natural law that people would render less crime. I agree, if there are more legal philosophy patrolling crime would be very minimal. I rattling agree with both sides, you would have less crime if unwanted children are aborted and you would have less crime if police patrol more. Works Consulted Works Cited A smaller point to too consider: Gladwell left bug out one other major(ip) reason that, according to Levitts research, crime did dismount to declination in the 1990?s: the waning of the violent crack trade. (Thanks to Darren Rovell for pointing out the Gladwell blog.) Gladwell, Malcolm. Freakonomics. Freakonomics. Malcolm Gladwell, n.d. Web. 1 Apr. 2011.If you want to get a respectable essay, do it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay